![]() On a per-minute basis, Jordan also did more than Kobe has with respect to rebounds, assists, steals and blocked shots. Jordan’s advantages with respect to Kobe, though, are not confined to shooting from the field. ![]() ![]() In sum, Kobe has not been much better than average with respect to shooting from the field. To put that in perspective, the average shooting guard in the NBA (since the 1979-80 season when the three-point shot was added to the NBA) has an effective field goal percentage of 48.56%. In contrast, Kobe’s mark with the Lakers is only 48.72%. With the Bulls, MJ had an effective field goal percentage of 51.83%. For example, when we compare what Jordan did for the Chicago Bulls to what Kobe did for the Lakers (before this season), although their scoring totals are similar, Jordan was the more efficient scorer. When we look at these numbers for Jordan and Kobe, it is clear that the former has a significant edge. The NBA tracks a variety of box score statistics to measure player performance. Jordan isn’t just better than Kobe in fact, when we measure the difference, we see that no one should suggest these two players are similar. The data, though, seem to tell a different story. But I also suspect that Kobe is “like Mike.” In other words, I imagine many people think the gap between these two players isn’t that large. At least, I think most people will agree that Jordan did more in his career than Kobe. All rights reserved.I suspect that few people agree with Jennings. Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and Safety Information / Your California Privacy Rights are applicable to you. ^ Back to Top ^ © 2023 ESPN Internet Ventures. Similar in style and mannerism, maybe, but when we translate the statistics for era, it becomes very clear that Jordan was actually the one "playing chess" while Bryant "plays checkers." In other words - and this should be obvious - when we watch Kobe play, we're seeing a far lesser version of Michael Jordan in action. Also, note the translated defensive ratings: aside from their age-21 seasons, MJ is better (sometimes vastly so) at every turn. The mark of a truly great offensive player is to maintain a high level of efficiency while taking on a large share of the team's offensive responsibility, and even though Kobe's numbers are impressive, Jordan is consistently more efficient than Bryant no matter if he's using more possessions or not. It's more interesting, though, to look at the efficiency levels the players maintained vs. Kobe's story is the opposite: with great teammates early, he didn't have to do as much, but when Shaq left before the '05 season, Kobe was actually forced to take a larger role in the offense than even Jordan ever had to. Paine shows a nice big chart, and then concludes:Īs you can see, out of necessity Jordan was taking on a large offensive responsibility early in his career as his teammates got better, he slowly eased back on the workload, and his efficiency improved as a result. Who's better, Michael Jordan or Kobe Bryant? Neil Paine of navigated numbers like points produced per 100 possessions used, the percentage of team possessions used when on the court, points allowed per 100 opponent possessions, and "the Pythagorean expectation." You have reached a degraded version of because you're using an unsupported version of Internet Explorer.įor a complete experience, please upgrade or use a supported browser
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |